Marissa Eduardo Biography

If you’re looking for information on the life and career of Marissa Eduardo, you’ve come to the right place. Founder of Sta. Elena Construction and Development Corporation is the mother of two children. Her first marriage wasn’t declared void by a court, and she was eventually convicted of bigamy. She is currently the president and chief executive officer of the company.

Alice Eduardo is Sta’s founder, president, and chief executive officer. Elena Construction and Development Corporation

Alice Eduardo is a tycoon and socialite from the Philippines. She is the founder, president, and chief executive of Sta. Elena Construction and Development Corporation. Her firm is categorized as Large B and AAA, which means it can bid on billion-peso projects. Initially, Alice wanted to be an engineer but chose to take care of the family business. Now, she is the CEO of a construction company worth Php300 million.

When she was a young construction entrepreneur, Eduardo’s company had won significant projects in Batangas and Metro Manila. However, a crisis hit the country in 1998, and the firm’s fortunes took a hit. Its heavy equipment, which it had acquired through dollar loans, sat idle due to the slowdown in construction activity.

She learned a lot of business lessons in her family’s businesses. At the time of the Asian financial crisis, the construction industry was hit the worst, but Alice Eduardo refused to give up and sold her heavy equipment at a loss. She sacrificed to keep her company going. By the time the economy recovered, she was able to use her savvy to build SM Mall of Asia.

Alice Eduardo is an entrepreneur with a passion for construction. She shares her entrepreneurial experience with aspirants in her spare time. In addition to working full-time at Sta. Elena also spends weekends with her family.

Eduardo grew up in a traditional Filipino family. Her mother discouraged her from studying to be an engineer and suggested that she become a nurse or doctor. Eventually, she settled for a degree in management to balance her family and career. During her childhood, she worked for her family’s businesses, including a bowling center in Nueva Ecija.

Despite the difficulties and financial hardship, Alice Eduardo could acquire high-end heavy equipment. Despite the economic crisis, she did not sell it and sacrificed much to keep it. This stance paid off because her company could comply with more construction projects when the economy began to recover. For instance, when Henry Sy wanted to build a big mall in Pasay, Sta. Elena had the heavy equipment to construct the foundation. The company was then able to bid for the project and won.

In addition to building construction projects, Eduardo is also a philanthropist. The company has recently funded the construction of a 320-square-meter pediatric hematology-oncology isolation ward for the Philippine General Hospital. This ward is capable of accommodating fifteen terminally ill cancer patients.

Marissa Eduardo’s first marriage was not judicially declared void.

In the case of Marissa Eduardo, the first marriage was not judicially declared a nullity, even though it was not void. A nullity can only be reported if the person’s first marriage was annulled or dissolved by force. Otherwise, the union will remain valid until the voidance is declared. This is precisely what happened in this case. In June 1989, the woman learned that Roberto was living with another woman. The woman also learned that Roberto was disposing of the properties she purchased without her consent or knowledge.

Although Noberto’s first marriage was not judiciary-declared void, he could still marry Alice G. Eduardo, although his first marriage was not judicially declared a nullity. However, the crime of bigamy was already committed when Noberto married Alice, and she was unaware of this fact.

Marissa Eduardo was convicted of bigamy.

Marissa Eduardo was convicted of a bigamous marriage, although her first marriage no longer exists. In a preliminary ruling, the trial court found that the prosecution had proved that the offense constituted bigamy in violation of Article 349 of the Revised Penal Code. It further held that Eduardo’s argument that her first marriage ended because her first wife was not living with him was insufficient to protect him from being convicted of bigamy.

After his first wife, Rubylus Gana, divorced, Eduardo met Tina B. Gandalera, a 21-year-old computer secretarial student in Dagupan City. They were married on July 28, 1975, but Eduardo reportedly did not tell his wife he had previously married someone else. Eduardo’s parents assured Tina that he was free to marry anyone else. But in January 2001, Eduardo stopped visiting his wife, claiming that he had another wife.

The prosecution must prove that the first marriage was not legally dissolved. Furthermore, according to the Civil Code, the absent spouse must not have died or become presumed dead. The second marriage must also meet specific essential requirements to be deemed valid. Ultimately, the Supreme Court determined that Noberto was legally married to Gina when he married Alice.

Eduardo, meanwhile, lives in Los Angeles and Manila. She was named one of Go Negosyo’s 50 Inspiring Women of Passion. Eduardo paid $8,275,000 for an 8,522-square-foot Ortigas home in 2013. The home has French doors, a two-story living room, a double-sided staircase, a formal dining room, a gourmet kitchen, a family room, and a library.

Even though Eduardo and his wife were married before, the trial court ruled that the first element of bigamy – the legal dissolution of the first marriage – were not present in the case. The second element, the legal dissolution of the first marriage, is a necessary element of bigamy. The two women were married on December 4, 1994. Noberto subsequently filed a motion for reconsideration but was denied.

The Supreme Court of the Philippines has since exonerated Eduardo from criminal liability based on the presumptive death of his first wife. The Supreme Court noted that, in the case of bigamy, a prior judicial nullity of the first marriage must have existed before the second one. This judicial declaration would make the second marriage null and void.

In the case of Francis and Jacqueline, the two were married when the former’s marriage to Nerrian was still in effect. However, they claimed immunity from bigamy because the former had converted to Islam before getting married. Nonetheless, the regional trial court denied their motion for reconsideration and convicted the new couple. The two then appealed to the CA.